Experiment Adevanced Mathmatical formula to determine SMV

[Brahcel]

I've been wanting to post this for a while so please help me come up with the formula.

Your value in the eyes of stupid foids (99.98%) of them is

LOOKS x HEIGHT x (net wealth over the amount you will spend on her) example $100k networth, spend $1000 on/for her
x Personality/charm/game/ect
x status/job/popularity
x what u will do for her
minus distance from her

Factor that with Location (Germany or Syria) and Competition from chads/normies/tinder


Feel free to add more, I speak from decades of social experiments and experience around the world so please do not pretend to add/remove if you are inexperienced.

 

[Thebiggestloser]

So the less you’re willing no to spend the higher smv???

So the less you’re willing no to spend the higher smv???

Willing to *

 

[Brahcel]

So the less you’re willing no to spend the higher smv???

Willing to *

No that formula is

Your wealth (that she knows about or notices) and the amount you spend on her or on "dates"
Even on reddit I read a foid left a millionair BF because he was very stingy and a miser,

Someone making $500 a week and buying her a gift every now and then and paying for cheap food when going out has a much higher SMV (when other factors are the same) then the above mentioned millionair who ate soups at home with his GF



Also feel free too add smaller factors such as:
Clothes/style
haircut LOL

 

[Hunter]

Cookie IQ post

 

[Thebiggestloser]

Lol fuck paying for multiple dates. Smash and dash baby. Paying for dates doesn’t raise smv it only makes her feel like shes not a worthless slut. Which they all are. They’re resource sucking vampire whores and once they realize they cant suck resources from you( money or status) they’re gone like the wind. And that’s even if you’re an 8/10. Best believe 8/10 women can get 8/10 guys to betabuxx for them

 

[BoltzmanOscillate]

Cookie IQ post

 

[Brahcel]

"Adevanced Mathmatical formula"

deliberate misspelling to make sure low IQs do not open.

Lol fuck paying for multiple dates. Smash and dash baby. Paying for dates doesn’t raise smv it only makes her feel like shes not a worthless slut. Which they all are. They’re resource sucking vampire whores and<b> once they realize they cant suck resources from you( money or status) they’re gone like the wind</b>. And that’s even if you’re an 8/10. Best believe 8/10 women can get 8/10 guys to betabuxx for them

so u agree with me

 

[Brahcel]

no but how is this an advanced mathematical formula. I fucked my education up and can still read formulas. All i see is everything x everything - one thing. But also how are you quantifying these things. What unit of measurement do we use here and what scale. How are these things measurable and how do they fit into the formula.

Well I started to write a big one but KNEW I should keep it simple initially for it to catch on. This is just a preliminary formula. It is open sourced so we can all fix it

 

[Brahcel]

bumb

 

[Henry de Montherlant]

deliberate misspelling to make sure low IQs do not open.

Tesla High IQ

 

[Deleted member 10234]

I've been wanting to post this for a while so please help me come up with the formula.

Your value in the eyes of stupid foids (99.98%) of them is

LOOKS x HEIGHT x (net wealth over the amount you will spend on her) example $100k networth, spend $1000 on/for her
x Personality/charm/game/ect
x status/job/popularity
x what u will do for her
minus distance from her

Factor that with Location (Germany or Syria) and Competition from chads/normies/tinder


Feel free to add more, I speak from decades of social experiments and experience around the world so please do not pretend to add/remove if you are inexperienced.

Apparently I'm an uber Chad (your formula is bad because you don't have any units btw lel)

2 * 6 * $1 / $0.00000000000000000000000000000000001 * 1 * 1 * 1 - 1 = huge number

Now where the fucks my foid ?

 

[Brahcel]

Apparently I'm an uber Chad (your formula is bad because you don't have any units btw lel)

2 * 6 * $1 / $0.00000000000000000000000000000000001 * 1 * 1 * 1 - 1 = huge number

Now where the fucks my foid ?

Explain ur stuff in detail mr.joker

 

[Deleted member 10234]

Explain ur stuff in detail mr.joker

Really small number = amount im willing to spend on her (nothing)
Divide by really small number = really big number

 

[Brahcel]

Didnt say divide. Said fraction. 2 over 10 is 20%

 

[Brahcel]

no one can contribute? Where are the high IQ members that come every now and then

 

[YalaDAMNchili]

low iq post

 

[Brahcel]

low iq post

negros cant understand

 

[Ragellsaveus]

This is really interesting, in my opinion the best approach would be to keep all the variables constant but one and observe how it affects the amount of pussy that person gets varying that variable. Then we could estimate the importance of each variable in the final result, and multiplying each term with a coefficient associated with that relative impact on SMV

 

[Brahcel]

This is really interesting, in my opinion the best approach would be to keep all the variables constant but one and observe how it affects the amount of pussy that person gets varying that variable. Then we could estimate the importance of each variable in the final result, and multiplying each term with a coefficient associated with that relative impact on SMV

Thanks for your post.....kinda gave up on these guys for now.

But I don't think its possible to keep things constant in a dynamic environment in a short time. Most normies will realize what factors work after decades of life experiences.

Share some insight brah
Changes I am thinking of doing. Pretend to be poor/rich. Shoe lifts. Different attitude. Maybe different car and styles

 

[Ragellsaveus]

Thanks for your post.....kinda gave up on these guys for now.

But I don't think its possible to keep things constant in a dynamic environment in a short time. Most normies will realize what factors work after decades of life experiences.

Share some insight brah
Changes I am thinking of doing. Pretend to be poor/rich. Shoe lifts. Different attitude. Maybe different car and styles

It´s great to discuss these things!
Now that I think about it, we could use the king of all weapons used on dynamic systems, statistics!

I would take raw data on males taking notes of their smv (race, height, bodyfat, face, frame) and using social media following as a rough estimate on social status. Finding some honest data on how much people do actually get laid would be the greatest problem though, and I can´t come up with a solution other than a lie detector.

 

[Brahcel]

It´s great to discuss these things!
Now that I think about it, we could use the king of all weapons used on dynamic systems, statistics!

I would take raw data on males taking notes of their smv (race, height, bodyfat, face, frame) and using social media following as a rough estimate on social status. Finding some honest data on how much people do actually get laid would be the greatest problem though, and I can´t come up with a solution other than a lie detector.

Dont forget location. That is a big understated one. Syria or europe

 

[UBERCEL]

"Adevanced Mathmatical formula"

 

[Ragellsaveus]

Dont forget location. That is a big understated one. Syria or europe

good point

 

[Deleted member 4159]

 

[Brahcel]

You guys just don't understand. No argument at all

 

[Anger]

Stupid thread

 

[Brahcel]

Great thread

 

[Deleted member 10234]

Didnt say divide. Said fraction. 2 over 10 is 20%

Extremely low IQ post.

 

[Gremlincel]

Hm.. well, for one thing, you forgot to factor in dick size, boyo!

 

[Deleted member 12355]

(Amount of showers had on average for every day during the last 30 day)*(the rating of your personality)/5
Example: (1*5)/5 = 1
If you shower once a day during the course of a month, and have a personality rating of 5, you can be expected to have one new foid every month to have sex with, according to this very accurate and scientific equation

 

[VisVoi]

Some of these things aren't quantifiable, how are they supposed to be used in a formula?

 

[everythingislava]

You've got to be the lowest IQ user I've ever encountered on here.

 

[Deleted member 12355]

Some of these things aren't quantifiable, how are they supposed to be used in a formula?

(Amount of showers had on average for every day during the last 30 day)*(the rating of your personality)/5
Example: (1*5)/5 = 1
If you shower once a day during the course of a month, and have a personality rating of 5, you can be expected to have one new foid every month to have sex with, according to this very accurate and scientific equation

 

[RopeMaXXer]

You've got to be the lowest IQ user I've ever encountered on here.

rudeposters with anime girls are based

 

[Brahcel]

Hm.. well, for one thing, you forgot to factor in dick size, boyo!

Dicksize matters somewhat but not in the initial evaluation (unless swimsuit)
maybe this stuff is still too far advanced for you followers. If you were not aware of chads/incels in jr high. You are slow

Some of these things aren't quantifiable, how are they supposed to be used in a formula?

like what?

 

[engineerescortceler]

x what u will do for her

over for lazycels

 

[Brahcel]

over for lazycels

lol yeah. Guess add lazy to my list now

 

[Brahcel]

Should I make another thread with the enhanced version? Seems most of u forgot about this

 

[vikmonster]

This can be predicted easily enough using standard deviations of populations (height, money, etc)m the studies of looks and decile effectiveness (blackpills archive) and constructing a big old normal curve. I’ll do it today or tmrw as I will have nothing to do

 

[fOreVER]

@Rice Cel do your thing

 

[vikmonster]

Preliminary looks like this:
Consider a normal distribution with mean a and standard deviation o. This is the distribution of cumulative scores of all people, made on the assumption that the each part of the score is an independent variable.

Score is determined by: height (in percentile of men shorter than you. A score of 99 means you are taller than 99 percent of men) x constant1, x money (in percentile below you, aka score of 99 means you are the (((1%))) ) x constant2, x facial characteristics (to be determined) x constant3, x race multiplier (I.e. 1 for white foids if you’re white, approx 0.8 for white foids if you’re black, etc. from the online dating study)

The constants are derived from the biggest study in the blackpills archive - one that shows how much money is needed to compensate for other factors.

Your score is then ranked against the score of the population, and your percentile is achieved, this percentile is then used to determine smv.

Referencing the study above, we can see that 10s have 300%avg success, 9s have 150% Ish and so forth. These values are divided by 300% to arbitrarily assign an average 10 smv value of 100. A curve will be constructed to model if for values from 0 to 10. Your percentile is then divided by ten to get your decile. This decile is used with the curve constructed to find the smv. Simply compare the smv with other people, or use the raw success rate to estimate your percentage success.

 

[Brahcel]

This can be predicted easily enough using standard deviations of populations (height, money, etc)m the studies of looks and decile effectiveness (blackpills archive) and constructing a big old normal curve. I’ll do it today or tmrw as I will have nothing to do

Thanks bro. u Got charts and graphs ?

Preliminary looks like this:
Consider a normal distribution with mean a and standard deviation o. This is the distribution of cumulative scores of all people, made on the assumption that the each part of the score is an independent variable.

Score is determined by: height (in percentile of men shorter than you. A score of 99 means you are taller than 99 percent of men) x constant1, x money (in percentile below you, aka score of 99 means you are the (((1%))) ) x constant2, x facial characteristics (to be determined) x constant3, x race multiplier (I.e. 1 for white foids if you’re white, approx 0.8 for white foids if you’re black, etc. from the online dating study)

The constants are derived from the biggest study in the blackpills archive - one that shows how much money is needed to compensate for other factors.

Your score is then ranked against the score of the population, and your percentile is achieved, this percentile is then used to determine smv.

Referencing the study above, we can see that 10s have 300%avg success, 9s have 150% Ish and so forth. These values are divided by 300% to arbitrarily assign an average 10 smv value of 100. A curve will be constructed to model if for values from 0 to 10. Your percentile is then divided by ten to get your decile. This decile is used with the curve constructed to find the smv. Simply compare the smv with other people, or use the raw success rate to estimate your percentage success.

Godlike math iq. I knew if i bumped this enough u would finally come. Looking forward to your report and charts. U are making history here

 

[guerillahubris]

Looks should between 1-9.

Height should be a multiplier to looks where 6 foot = 1, any height below goes to a decimal going to 0 and heights above 6 foot should go > 1.

You also need a money equation that factors networth salary and location to give you a unitless coefficient.

Game should be a multiplier around 1 that is give or take based on your confidence/charm, similar to the height number.

For each of these variables you need probability distribution (make up a reasonable mean and sd) and then create the probability distribution for smv = f(looks,money,game)

 

[Rice Cel]

@Rice Cel do your thing

Lol people here are coming up w very complicated equations

All we're trying to measure is how favorable foids will view you and all you need in the real world is a bit of common sense without needing any math

I'd just multiply looks money and status and add up everything else since they're not as important as the first 3 and make a scale from 0 to the highest number

 

[San Salvador]

 

[fOreVER]

Lol people here are coming up w very complicated equations

All we're trying to measure is how favorable foids will view you and all you need in the real world is a bit of common sense without needing any math

I'd just multiply looks money and status and add up everything else since they're not as important as the first 3 and make a scale from 0 to the highest number

If we have someone studying acturial math he could actually come up with a very accurate equation

 

[rabitter]

Anything multiplied by Curry is zero.

 

[Vodaccenu]

Using math to determine how subhuman you are, this is why you're incel.

 

[Brahcel]

Anything multiplied by Curry is zero.

lol, for the most part

JK

Using math to determine how subhuman you are, this is why you're incel.

I think math helps anyone who utilizes it.

 

[Deleted member 14577]

I already know it's over, no point in doing some math acrobatics.