https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/20...tudent-wins-80000-damages-man-cleared-raping/
Apparently the logic is that in a criminal court you must prove someone is guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt".
However in a civil court you must merely prove the "balance of probability" is in your favor.
Apparently the logic is that in a criminal court you must prove someone is guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt".
However in a civil court you must merely prove the "balance of probability" is in your favor.
