Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

About the woman's desire (Part 2)

nessahan alita

nessahan alita

Banned
-
Joined
Feb 6, 2021
Posts
36
When a nation invades and conquers the territory of another, the females of the dominated nation surrender themselves to the dominating ones. They do it so not only because they are forced, as it seems at first sight, but also because they are attracted to the males who hold the power. This may be verified, for example, in how the brazilian women behave in relation to north-american or european tourists. The inverse does not occur: the females of the dominant nation do not feel very attracted by the males of the dominated nation. Except for special cases, the general trend confirms my hypothesis.

Let us never forget that our delicious companions have a contradictory relationship with our phalus erectus: they fear it but simultaneously need it to feel desirable (they want to be desirable because it guarantees them protection, elevates self-esteem and makes them to be envied by rivals). From this contradiction derive all the absurd, disconcerting and illogical behaviors in their relationships with us, as well as their natural propensities for hysteria and the oscillation that leads them to attract to flee and repudiate soon after. This makes the feminine desire extremely difficult to be understood, mapped and described, even by themselves (here is another evidence that the characteristics described here are unconscious). Therefore, never take seriously what they say. Except in exceptional cases, if you are intensely interested, you will be repudiated or avoided. There is a very clear objective here: to intensify our passions and our desires to induce us to the chase and the insistence to make them feel desirable, and so they enjoy the feeling of being "the hottest".

We are only wanted to fecundate, give protection to the female, her offspring and perform dangerous, heavy and difficult tasks. The sex while an act of pleasure is a simple retribution to this function. Out of these fields, we are not needed for anything else. Our lack will be felt only if we offer these benefits and take them from time to time, as punishment for some mistake. That is: your partner will endure immensely your absence and will not feel any miss of you or lack of sex unless seeing herself to be exposed to some danger or difficulty. The passionate is not valued because it is always available. The same goes for the harasser.

Rejecting the harasser pleases them very much (I do not mean the psychopaths who harass without being provoked and consciously insist against the woman's obvious desires to keep them apart, but rather to the bumbling men who do so because they believe they are pleasing or that have a chance with the desired woman. Usually such confusion occurs for two reasons: a) the harasser misinterprets the signals sent by the feminine behavior; b) the woman sends, intentionally or not, signs indicating that she is interested, thus maintaining the hopes of the unfortunate). The rejection is highly rewarding for raising their self-esteem. This is why they insinuate themselves, pretending to be interested, to kindly reject us then. When they can not reject, that is, when no one else wants them because they are "ugly" (cough) (the society has unfortunately agreed that the women lose their beauty as they get older and to this day refuses to relativize the beautiful), then they become depressed. Reject instead of being rejected is one of the insane obsessions of the feminine unconscious.

The feminine desire is not what it shows at first sight, it has many nuances and contradictions. A widely publicized mistake is that we will be loved if we always take pleasant actions. This is just part of the truth. The sleazes, for example, have their attitudes unanimously reproved by all but are loved, swim in harems. What is up? This is simple: the attitudes are deprecated while those who do them become more loved precisely because they have the courage to challenge general approval, including that of women. The attitudes of the sleaze, and also of the mature and true man, have several implications on the feminine unconscious. Do not just be guided by what people say and assume explicitly.

The feminine unconscious does not see the masculine goodness as something noble which must be reciprocated with faithful love. It sees as a symptom of weakness that needs to be exploited for personal gain and nothing more than that. This is why the submissive flatterers carry horns: they serve for nothing but work, provide and carry horns. By assuming passive role in the relationship, they report that they are inferior copies (this is a manifestation of the process of natural selection described by Darwin) of the species, carriers of the worst genes and therefore unsuitable for mating. Consequently, the females do not feel sexual arousal for them. When the submissives marry, they receive only a rationed amount of erotic favors, the minimum to not rebel against the training.

We often find them entranced by reading water-with-sugar novels and we believe for this that the romantic men correspond to the masculine ideal that they bring in the soul and to which they ardently desire to surrender. This is a mistake: the romantic is an emotional slave who gives love without receive it and does not completes them. When reading the novels, the readers place themselves in the role of the simple girl of little beauty who conquers and submits by love the hero who is at the top of the male hierarchy. It is curious to note that in such novels the passionate hero satisfies all the absurd dreams (for the unconscious does not follow what we call logic) of the young lady but he does not have his dreams satisfied because it is a simple servant. The readers imagine themselves receiving love and not giving, as it sometimes seems. There is as much perversity and cruelty as there is in masculine pornography because the peculiarities of the opposite sex are violated. The affection and the sex that the heroes of the romantic tales receive are minimal and love is asexual or only slightly sexed. There is no pornography. The pink-color tales are stories of feminine victories in the battle of love. They are "epic" in this sense.

The other half of the problem does not appear in the romantic tales for being unconscious and is precisely what we are interested in knowing: the stories in which we won the battles. The part of our soul that conquers them is cold, ruthless, cruel, decisive, secure, objective, and yet protective. It is this side that dominates them.

There are two forms of coldness and mastery: the protective and exploitative-oppressive. The first one benefits them and is desired for meeting the biological and social needs of the woman. The second scares them, causes hatred and repulsion. We have abused the second form in the past (this was the error of extremist machismo. In doing so, it provided ample reasons for the rebelliousness of women. The outcome of the evolution of this process of abuse of power was the birth of feminism) and today we face the consequences. We are hated because when we had the power in hand, we use it in the wrong way. We can only correct the error now.

Master (to avoid any confusion, let us totally differentiate dominance from domination. In these posts I suggest to man only the self-mastery, the mastery of the situation involving both partners, the relationship and, when requested and consented, of the woman (in the purely loving sense of the word and nowhere else – I am totally opposed to the domination of unrelated minds for any purpose whatsoever). This idea of dominance (and not of domination) raised much controversy. The consensual dominance, discussed here, is in fact a natural result of the renunciation of coercive domination. The coercive domination is oppressive. By completely and truthfully renouncing coercive domination, the woman experience a sense of vulnerability (unprotection) that leads them to unconsciously claim dominant masculine postures. This solicitude is expressed in the form of provocative, challenging and irritating behavior. This seems to be related to the Elektra complex or, at least, to be somehow tied to the paternal question) to protect her, take command.

The need to be protected is linked to the need to feel close to a superior male that inspires them a little fear (as it was when she was a child in relation to the father. Again, the same complex). They like to look up and want to be welcomed into the territory of some powerful stallion. The ladies with high command power, who does obey no one, whom all serve and hasten to please (queens, princesses, big business women, etc) tend to be depressed for not having this requirement fulfilled.

When the ladies say they want the good, the sensitive, the romantic, honest, hard worker and sentimental they are telling the truth but partially because they do not reveal for what they want them. And for what do they want them? To serve them while they give their heart, soul and sex to the insensitive and sleazes. The good are desired as beasts of burden, providers that guarantee the raising of the offspring but never as breeders. The reproductive function is for the bad, unfortunately, because they communicate that they are carriers of the best genes in the sense of animal survival, since they do not seek the love of anyone to be happy (this is an ancestral reminiscence of the hominid primates, among whom the most powerful and intelligent to face the hostile and savage world was the best protector. I suspect that civilized life has reversed or distorts the sense of the feminine selective criterion). This explains why villains, mafiosos, celebrities, unscrupulous businessmen and powerful have so many beautiful women. It also explains why good husbands usually only receive a minimum in sexual terms and why the wives do not feel for these latter ones, great passions or excitations.

When it comes to discovering the feminine's desires to succeed in conquest there are many lies, confusions and pitfalls. A well-known trap is that we should make them laugh so that they surrender and love us. According to this absurd theory, those who make them laugh would be the preferred. I will now unmask this lie so propagated.

The ladies really pay special attention to the guys that make them laugh and this can be a good way to get closer, but if you confine yourself to it, will be just a simple clown. She will use you like a comedian who does not charge for work and will not pay a penny. How much they like to take advantage of the muggles, exploiting them to get favors for free, they use the unfortunate funny ones to relieve their crises of sadness and depression, emerged from the oscillations of the hormone. The free clowns are used and exploited by the smart ones in the same way as other types of muggles, like those fools who hurry to send flowers, pay for drinks, give gifts, carry bags, offer them the seat in public vehicles, etc, without receiving anything in return, let alone sex. It may be good to play the fool for the sake of approach but, once you have gotten in touch, you need to change the conduct to go further or will end up sucking your own thumb, not to say something else... To be loved, it is necessary not only to make them laugh once in a while but also, and perhaps mainly, to make them cry with certain frequency.

The apparent contradiction inherent in the feminine desire, which is actually the simple concealment of its most important facet, is the main factor that makes us so confused and lost. The problem lies in us, in our wrong view about the opposite sex, not on them. The absurd beliefs we carry, inculcated since childhood, make them seem incomprehensible, incoherent and absurd in our eyes, but in reality, the feminine psyche follows a logic (completely different of what we imagine) and is totally understandable. The ladies are not incomprehensible as they often intend to appear (there is an apparent illogicality and a real illogicality. Both may or may not be unconscious and intentional. There are cases where the woman wants to look illogical without actually being it in fact, but she is not conscious of such desire. In this case, the illogicity serves a deeper logical goal. There are other cases where she is really illogical. The latter case results from contradictory and mutually excluding wishes. But in both cases there may be variable residues of consciousness. We can know nothing about the immediate consciousness of the other).
 
Last edited:
tl;dr women want chads.
 
Nice read

Link for the first part ?
 
In other words: Chad only
 

Similar threads

SecularNeo-Khazar
Replies
0
Views
104
SecularNeo-Khazar
SecularNeo-Khazar
Destroyed lonely
Replies
19
Views
279
Destroyed lonely
Destroyed lonely
Masquerade
Replies
11
Views
229
Better Off Alone
Better Off Alone
Efiliste
Replies
25
Views
694
Efiliste
Efiliste

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top