Freixel
Captain
★★★★★
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2023
- Posts
- 1,920
Copy paste my message in another thread:
I'm going to put what I know here, it's going to be long:
I have read several books on National Socialism and Fascism including Mein Kampf, Walter Darre, Feder, Serrano, Savitri Devi, Evola, and others.
After reading and reflecting on the sources and not the books, series and movies that the Judeo-Zionist winners want us to see so that we believe their version of the facts, I have come to the conclusion that in any case National Socialism was an ideology:
A) Product of its time and the racialist and Darwinist/biological sociopolitical paradigms that had been forming in Europe since the 19th century.
B) That Hitler was no angel, although his image is distorted by allied propaganda
C) That there were aspects and diverse visions within National Socialism and that this movement was changing and adapting to situations from the moment it was born, it was dynamic in some aspects, not completely static.
My opinion:
1) The idea of merging Socialism + Ethnonationalism sounds like heaven to me, it is the perfect Nations model for me, but this is all on paper
2) The founding idea of the NS movement is racism and pan-Germanic Aryan-Nordic supremacism, pan-European identity second, and then comes its socialist aspect
3) The NS was corporativist, it did not completely destroy class society in the Marxist style, those Germans who had power and subjugated the lower classes with slave labor remained in power, although during Hitler's government various aid and incentives were given to the working classes, that is a bit of their socialism.
4) Hitler was not financed by the Rothchilds or by the jews in general, although I do not like his ideology and may disagree with many things, the reality is that his movement proposed a total change of system, a change in the "world order " of things, he really tryed to end the Jewish world power
5) Nordic Supremacism is real and its origin dates back to the European racism of the 19th century mixed with Social Darwinism, Hitler did not invent anything new in this regard. This cannot be covered by the NS that are swarming on the internet
Hitler not so much, but many of his close circles truly believed that the tall, blonde, blue-eyed Nordic man was at the top of the food chain and that they were destined to rule humanity by mandate of providence or mandate of nature.
6) Racism against the Slavs was stupid and even he himself ended up admitting it internally
They were seen as a subrace of subhumans, a mix between Aryans and Mongoloids with Jews, but all this was nothing more than a propaganda tactic to achieve one goal: Justify Lebensraum, the expansion of German conquest towards Eastern Europe.
Hitler himself and his associates ended up realizing that a large number of the Slavic population were more "Aryan" than the Germans themselves, a mixture of Alpines with Nordics and Mongoloids, so they ended up taking them from their homes to "Germanize" them and absorb them into the Reich.
Hitler's ideal was to extract this Aryan population and Germanize it since Germany itself did not have enough surplus population to make the Lebensraum possible, so he need to acquire more Aryan population by other means, as for the rest of the Slavs "non-Aryans" his plan was to enslave them as labor... This is cruel and inhumane no matter how you look at it, wanting to enslave European neighbors... this is where any myth of a Hitler of good heart but misunderstood falls down.
7) In the "Holocaust" around 500,000 died, there was never a systematic plan to genocide the Jews and the gas chambers did not exist, but the Holocaust is not necessary to observe Hitler's cruelty and evil: The Aktion T4 program that It was used to euthanize populations considered useless for the Reich it is enough to realize the dark side of Nazism, and this was not against a population considered enemy but against the Germans themselves.
8) I consider Social Darwinism, eugenics and state-sponsored biologism an aberration, something that will never make me be able to be on the side of National Socialism, they basically wanted to copy the Sparta model but with modern technology. This has nothing to do with me liking ethnonationalism, one thing is to defend your race and another is to try to genetically modify it to make it "superior"
9) I don't like Nordicism/Aryan Supremacism
10) The Mediterranean Race of Southern Europe was considered a sister race, even above the Slavs (which makes no sense), but they were left in second place, as if they were a silver prize. I refuse to support a movement that considers me a silver prize and puts me below, I see no reason to support National Socialism unless you are an Aryan or a cuck.
11) Feder's ideas of creating an economic system that was detached from world banking and would work by feeding itself was brilliant, perhaps one of the most redeemable things about Nazism. Also the barter market closed with allies. This impulse to disengage from the "Global Jewish Economy" is the most redeemable thing about National Socialism.
The idea of the work-pattern and creating an economic system without inflation... since the state would self-finance its own works without contracting debt with anyone, and that the work done and the wealth created would be the pattern by which the economy would be governed, and not dollar bills or gold... this was great.
At least on paper. According to the official version of history, Germany had extremely high inflation due to not being able to sustain all the printed money.
