its strange that i havent seen this posted here before since it seems like a pretty potent blackpill,though i hate the writing style in these mainstream articles since most of the time they sound as though written by a foid or a turbocuck.
www.dailymail.co.uk
Researchers found that, rather than being grateful for the fall-back option, being rejected by an attractive man actually makes a woman more likely to turn down an unattractive one, and to describe him harshly.
i think this makes sense from a dual mating strategy perspective, foids first try and have their fill before "settling down" for a beta cuck with money, if the toilet may find that their cock carousel expanditures are not up to standard, they will stall the wait to find a provider for their chad offspring.
For the study, researchers recruited 126 single women and created dating profiles for them.
The participants were told that these profiles would be viewed and evaluated by two men that they could potentially meet at the end of the experiment.
They then read the two men’s profiles (which had actually been written by the researchers); one had a photo of an attractive man attached, while the other was paired with a photo of an unattractive man.
Writing in the Journal of Social Psychological and Personality Science the researchers said: ‘Participants who were rejected by one of the men distanced themselves from and derogated him as indicated by less interest in meeting him and lower ratings of attractiveness, responsiveness, and romantic appeal compared to those in the acceptance and control conditions.
‘Of greatest interest, participants who were rejected by the attractive man were also relatively uninterested in meeting the unattractive man and derogated him even when he was accepting.’
The researchers then carried out a second, identical experiment with another 166 women and found that the same thing happened.
‘Being rejected by the attractive man appeared to make participants less willing to affiliate with the unattractive man and more inclined to evaluate him harshly,’ the researchers concluded.
Losing out in love makes women CRUEL
Researchers at the University of Toronto found that being rejected by an attractive man makes a woman more likely to turn down an unattractive one.
Researchers found that, rather than being grateful for the fall-back option, being rejected by an attractive man actually makes a woman more likely to turn down an unattractive one, and to describe him harshly.
i think this makes sense from a dual mating strategy perspective, foids first try and have their fill before "settling down" for a beta cuck with money, if the toilet may find that their cock carousel expanditures are not up to standard, they will stall the wait to find a provider for their chad offspring.
For the study, researchers recruited 126 single women and created dating profiles for them.
The participants were told that these profiles would be viewed and evaluated by two men that they could potentially meet at the end of the experiment.
They then read the two men’s profiles (which had actually been written by the researchers); one had a photo of an attractive man attached, while the other was paired with a photo of an unattractive man.
Writing in the Journal of Social Psychological and Personality Science the researchers said: ‘Participants who were rejected by one of the men distanced themselves from and derogated him as indicated by less interest in meeting him and lower ratings of attractiveness, responsiveness, and romantic appeal compared to those in the acceptance and control conditions.
‘Of greatest interest, participants who were rejected by the attractive man were also relatively uninterested in meeting the unattractive man and derogated him even when he was accepting.’
The researchers then carried out a second, identical experiment with another 166 women and found that the same thing happened.
‘Being rejected by the attractive man appeared to make participants less willing to affiliate with the unattractive man and more inclined to evaluate him harshly,’ the researchers concluded.
Last edited:
