Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious A man's looks are normally 10% of his value, 90% is money, status, and yes, personality

highschoolcel

highschoolcel

My jawline = Your sexlife
-
Joined
Feb 1, 2018
Posts
3,899
In a normal society, a man's look is 10% of his value.

90% is his money, status and personality.

The reason why men's looks are now SO important is because due to cultural and legal changes, female literally do not need men anymore for anything else than casual sex.

Let me explain.

Imagine living in a normal ("traditional") society.
- contraception doesn't exist (best thing you can do is pull out)
- abortion does't exist (best thing you can do is drink dangerous poison or insert things in your vagina, which is very risky and painful)
- child support does't exist : so if you choose the wrong guy, tough luck bitch, good luck raising these kids alone OR having to give your pussy to some ultra low-tier male because no normies would want to marry a non-virgin, let alone a single mom.
- more of less all religion say that if you have sex before marriage you're a whore and you're going to hell

Because of everything said above, women MUST be careful about who they date.

Add to that the religious aspect, and basically you have a decent supply of virgins looking for a guy who will be their husband for life and who they will depend on to raise their children.

But it doesn't stop there.

In a normal society there is no feminism so most women wouldn't even be brainwashed into trying to "get a career". Even those who would, would have to brutally fight in a competitive market where men are naturally better, especially in high paying fields. This increases even more the need to find a man who can bring financial security to the table.

Add all that to the mix and you can see how incredibly important it would be for women - even in industrialised, safe societies - to choose a guy not only based on his looks, but also on his personality (stable, nice) and financial status.

What we see today is not normal, and it's not just due to the fact that our societies are "safe" or "rich". It's primarily the result of cultural changes which led to legal changes. Ban contraception, ban all "gender equality" laws, ban abortion, ban child support, and I guarantee these whores will quickly learn to respect a hard working accountant again.

All it takes is for women to be hold accountable for their bad choices.

Got knocked up by Chad and he left you ? Don't be a whore next time bitch, and pass the word. No you can't kill your child and no we won't give you free money. Your best bet is this short balding ginger, he might give you a second chance IF YOU'RE NICE.

Focused on your career and you're now past the wall ? Cool, enjoy spending the rest of your life with cats. Btw, the average male employee still performs way better than you so actually you're fired. But they need a lady to clean the toilets at the mall so here's your chance.


Imagine spending hours studying lookmaxxxxing and spending thousands on surgery to please some fucking bitch.

Imagine being in a system that give to women for free 90% of what men would normally bring to the table.

Our grand fathers were short, bald, some were fat, and they were ALL MARRIED, ALL WITH CHILDREN.
 
Last edited:
Blame social media for that
 
Blame social media for that

It's much more than social media.

It's the global consciousness that is to blame.

Most men are feminist at heart and everything is a reflection of that.
 
And money, status and personality are significantly affected by your looks.


Looks are as important for children as they are for adults. Children are treated differently by their parents based on their looks, and this shapes their personality, as much as personality is non-genetic and can be shaped by environment.

For children (overall d+ = .697 ; 66% vs. 34%), attractiveness had the largest effect on evaluations of competence (d+ = .81; 69% vs. 31%), followed by negative interaction (d+ = -.64; 65% vs. 35%) and positive interaction (d+ = .52; 62% vs. 38%). A smaller yet still significant effect of attractiveness was found for the subcategory of attention/caregiving (d+ — .29; 57% vs. 43%)

1732410709487



In fact, as that study points out, one of the main theories explaining the effects of lookism, and probably the best such bluepilled theory I'd say, is that children are treated and socialized differently based on their looks by their parents and other adults, and that this differential treatment then has a determining effect on what their lives will eventually be in adulthood.

Imagine living in a normal ("traditional") society.
- contraception doesn't exist (best thing you can do is pull out)
- abortion does't exist (best thing you can do is drink dangerous poison or insert things in your vagina, which is very risky and painful)
- child support does't exist : so if you choose the wrong guy, tough luck bitch, good luck raising these kids alone OR having to give your pussy to some ultra low-tier male because no normies would want to marry a non-virgin, let alone a single mom.
We know for a fact that ancient societies have already used as contraception and abortificants anything that they could, to the point that the Romans have driven an entire plant species with such effects into extinction by using it so much.


Likewise, as @GeckoBus pointed out in one of his best threads, in the very first lawcode in the world, it is already written that men should support their wives and children after divorce.

It's endless lmao.
Bro, the FIRST lawcodes we have in written history, the FIRST FUCKING LAWCODE EVER:
The Code of Hammurabi (1754 BC) declares that a man must provide sustenance to a woman who has borne him children so that she can raise them:

137. If a man wish to separate from a woman who has borne him children, or from his wife who has borne him children: then he shall give that wife her dowry, and a part of the usufruct of field, garden, and property, so that she can rear her children. When she has brought up her children, a portion of all that is given to the children, equal as that of one son, shall be given to her. She may then marry the man of her heart.[3]


Because of everything said above, women MUST be careful about who they date.

Add to that the religious aspect, and basically you have a decent supply of virgins looking for a guy who will be their husband for life and who they will depend on to raise their children.
In a normal society there is no feminism so most women wouldn't even be brainwashed into trying to "get a career". Even those who would, would have to brutally fight in a competitive market where men are naturally better, especially in high paying fields. This increases even more the need to find a man who can bring financial security to the table.

Add all that to the mix and you can see how incredibly important it would be for women - even in industrialised, safe societies - to choose a guy not only based on his looks, but also on his personality (stable, nice) and financial status.
Yes, financial hypergamy has always existed. The higher classes would quickly arrange marriages between their children and the lower class guys would then compete for women on their economic level, with women never even thinking of marrying a man from a poorer family. Meanwhile, very attractive women could always become mistresses to higher status men, so this would constantly tighten the dating pool for lower status men.

Just because women weren't required to work and could be just supported by their husbands their entire lives (such "oppression:feelshaha:") didn't mean that they as a group were economically below men and that a guy could theoretically marry any of them just by having a job:feelskek:, a woman from a rich family would never even look at a guy from a poor family and her family would probably disown her if she did.

Our grand fathers were short, bald, some were fat, and they were ALL MARRIED, ALL WITH CHILDREN.
Just because our grandfathers reproduced doesn't automatically mean that all the men of their generation. Basic survivor bias.
 
Last edited:
Alpha fucks, beta bucks and thats how it has always been throughout history.
Let a genetically gifted man jizz in her cunt to receive healthy offspring, while a poor sucker on the sideline provides
financially.
Female dual mating strategy

And me personally, would rather die a virgin and stay single for the rest of my life, instead of settling for someone who sees me as a
2nd option financial provider, and is just with me cause the guy she really wants dipped
 
Blame social media for that
It's not social media. Boomers are as guilty of gynocentrism as anyone.

I hate being in a dystopian society where one thing every normalfag agrees on is kissing every woman's ass.
 
It's not social media. Boomers are as guilty of gynocentrism as anyone.

I hate being in a dystopian society where one thing every normalfag agrees on is kissing every woman's ass.
The problem is our inherent design. We chase something that will never love us.
 
Sadly we live in a Jewish world order.
 
In a normal society, a man's look is 10% of his value.

90% is his money, status and personality.

The reason why men's looks are now SO important is because due to cultural and legal changes, female literally do not need men anymore for anything else than casual sex.

Let me explain.

Imagine living in a normal ("traditional") society.
- contraception doesn't exist (best thing you can do is pull out)
- abortion does't exist (best thing you can do is drink dangerous poison or insert things in your vagina, which is very risky and painful)
- child support does't exist : so if you choose the wrong guy, tough luck bitch, good luck raising these kids alone OR having to give your pussy to some ultra low-tier male because no normies would want to marry a non-virgin, let alone a single mom.
- more of less all religion say that if you have sex before marriage you're a whore and you're going to hell

Because of everything said above, women MUST be careful about who they date.

Add to that the religious aspect, and basically you have a decent supply of virgins looking for a guy who will be their husband for life and who they will depend on to raise their children.

But it doesn't stop there.

In a normal society there is no feminism so most women wouldn't even be brainwashed into trying to "get a career". Even those who would, would have to brutally fight in a competitive market where men are naturally better, especially in high paying fields. This increases even more the need to find a man who can bring financial security to the table.

Add all that to the mix and you can see how incredibly important it would be for women - even in industrialised, safe societies - to choose a guy not only based on his looks, but also on his personality (stable, nice) and financial status.

What we see today is not normal, and it's not just due to the fact that our societies are "safe" or "rich". It's primarily the result of cultural changes which led to legal changes. Ban contraception, ban all "gender equality" laws, ban abortion, ban child support, and I guarantee these whores will quickly learn to respect a hard working accountant again.

All it takes is for women to be hold accountable for their bad choices.

Got knocked up by Chad and he left you ? Don't be a whore next time bitch, and pass the word. No you can't kill your child and no we won't give you free money. Your best bet is this short balding ginger, he might give you a second chance IF YOU'RE NICE.

Focused on your career and you're now past the wall ? Cool, enjoy spending the rest of your life with cats. Btw, the average male employee still performs way better than you so actually you're fired. But they need a lady to clean the toilets at the mall so here's your chance.


Imagine spending hours studying lookmaxxxxing and spending thousands on surgery to please some fucking bitch.

Imagine being in a system that give to women for free 90% of what men would normally bring to the table.

Our grand fathers were short, bald, some were fat, and they were ALL MARRIED, ALL WITH CHI
Very good post.
My grandpa had 4 kids already at only 30 yo.
The moment it became so you had to looksmaxx and learn game and pills and make a ton of money and bulshit is when you know it's no longer normal, or worth it for that matter.
 
Alpha fucks, beta bucks and thats how it has always been throughout history.
Let a genetically gifted man jizz in her cunt to receive healthy offspring, while a poor sucker on the sideline provides
financially.
Female dual mating strategy

And me personally, would rather die a virgin and stay single for the rest of my life, instead of settling for someone who sees me as a
2nd option financial provider, and is just with me cause the guy she really wants dipped

View: https://youtu.be/740EcJLzsY8?si=CP4y-s7Uf5aJRBHj
 
Very good post.
My grandpa had 4 kids already at only 30 yo.
The moment it became so you had to looksmaxx and learn game and pills and make a ton of money and bulshit is when you know it's no longer normal, or worth it for that matter.


Spot on, high IQ post
 
Most of your personality is just as genetic as your looks and life experiences too which are based how others will threat based on your looks
 
but personality is a meme

even back then foids have been known to like dark triad/bad boys more
 

Similar threads

Stupid Clown
Replies
7
Views
529
Stupid Clown
Stupid Clown
Friezacel
Replies
34
Views
656
InternalJizzz
InternalJizzz
RegularManlet
Replies
25
Views
730
To koniec
To koniec
J
Replies
24
Views
609
A.M.KANGA
A.M.KANGA

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top