PPEcel
cope and seethe
-
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2018
- Posts
- 29,088
Dear ethnicels:
If you are reading this forum, you are probably not very privileged (in the sexual, social, or cultural sense). You might have spent much of life being bullied by other males. You are probably at the very bottom of the social hierarchy. So how do you feel when a bunch of pink-haired loudmouthed feminists stride up to you and insist that you are privileged, that you are an oppressor? When they accuse you (and your skinny, 5'5, 130-pound frame) of perpetuating toxic masculinity?
You'd laugh in their face, of course. You'd be pissed.
Whenever you label a certain group of people as privileged, the least privileged individuals within that group feels marginalized; they feel disregarded from the debate at hand. And that's what happens when ethnicels blurt out "JBW" or "just SEAmaxx bro". It's unfair to lump white incels in with white men as a whole.
Please do take the time to explain to incels of European descent as to why we face unique struggles, without discounting or invalidating their own experiences. Even though the cultural or interpersonal catalyst(s) behind our circumstances may vary from incel to incel, we are all here for a similar reason.
Dear whitecels:
Here's what you need to understand about being a ricecel or a currycel in the West. There is something inescapable about being Asian. Clearly, that has nothing to do with work ethic or our predisposition to criminality. In the United States, Asian-Americans outearn European-Americans and are more likely to attain a bachelor's. If we are somehow worse human beings, that's not reflected in terms of our socioeconomic outcomes.
Rather, it's the fact that we will always be perceived negatively -- as "effeminate", as "nerdy", as "robotic", as "weird" -- even if we make good choices in life. For reasons which basically boil down to crude stereotyping.
It's not really a surprise that Harvard, the eminent academic institution in North America, rated Asian-Americans with lower, vague "personality" scores, even for applicants they have never met. So would it really be a stretch to suggest that foids (even Asian foids) engage in similar logical pitfalls? Is it really that hard for you to acknowledge that a good number of ethnicels are psychosexually handicapped because many of us are instantaneously judged as uninteresting automatons who are good at calculus and nothing else?
This is not to suggest that ethnicels necessarily have it worse than white incels (or vice versa), but to suggest that some ethnicels face specific problems that whitecels don't. Just something to think about.
If you are reading this forum, you are probably not very privileged (in the sexual, social, or cultural sense). You might have spent much of life being bullied by other males. You are probably at the very bottom of the social hierarchy. So how do you feel when a bunch of pink-haired loudmouthed feminists stride up to you and insist that you are privileged, that you are an oppressor? When they accuse you (and your skinny, 5'5, 130-pound frame) of perpetuating toxic masculinity?
You'd laugh in their face, of course. You'd be pissed.
Whenever you label a certain group of people as privileged, the least privileged individuals within that group feels marginalized; they feel disregarded from the debate at hand. And that's what happens when ethnicels blurt out "JBW" or "just SEAmaxx bro". It's unfair to lump white incels in with white men as a whole.
Please do take the time to explain to incels of European descent as to why we face unique struggles, without discounting or invalidating their own experiences. Even though the cultural or interpersonal catalyst(s) behind our circumstances may vary from incel to incel, we are all here for a similar reason.
Dear whitecels:
Here's what you need to understand about being a ricecel or a currycel in the West. There is something inescapable about being Asian. Clearly, that has nothing to do with work ethic or our predisposition to criminality. In the United States, Asian-Americans outearn European-Americans and are more likely to attain a bachelor's. If we are somehow worse human beings, that's not reflected in terms of our socioeconomic outcomes.
Rather, it's the fact that we will always be perceived negatively -- as "effeminate", as "nerdy", as "robotic", as "weird" -- even if we make good choices in life. For reasons which basically boil down to crude stereotyping.
It's not really a surprise that Harvard, the eminent academic institution in North America, rated Asian-Americans with lower, vague "personality" scores, even for applicants they have never met. So would it really be a stretch to suggest that foids (even Asian foids) engage in similar logical pitfalls? Is it really that hard for you to acknowledge that a good number of ethnicels are psychosexually handicapped because many of us are instantaneously judged as uninteresting automatons who are good at calculus and nothing else?
This is not to suggest that ethnicels necessarily have it worse than white incels (or vice versa), but to suggest that some ethnicels face specific problems that whitecels don't. Just something to think about.
Last edited: