Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

"90% of CEOs are of above average height." - Wikipedia

Limerencel

Limerencel

Major
Joined
May 2, 2018
Posts
2,048
The disadvantages of being short expand far beyond dating:

Screen Shot 2018 08 13 at 190039


More info in the reference:
Screen Shot 2018 08 13 at 191006


Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Height_discrimination
 
I wonder if this would apply to major business between 1800-1900. I have a feeling it wouldn't. Also the average IQ of many CEOs while being slightly above average, tends to not be anything special. I'd really be questioning why there aren't many people with 130-160IQs in major positions of powers. It's all about status, looks, and connections. Not merit.
 
Actual inceldom is one of a truecels lowest worries.
 
The advantages of looks in general expand faaaaaar beyond daring.
 
For life height > face
For dating, face barely beats height, but if I had a chance, tall ugly > good looking manlet
 
I wonder if this would apply to major business between 1800-1900. I have a feeling it wouldn't. Also the average IQ of many CEOs while being slightly above average, tends to not be anything special. I'd really be questioning why there aren't many people with 130-160IQs in major positions of powers. It's all about status, looks, and connections. Not merit.

Just by intuition I would even expect them to have an average IQ but very low agreeableness and strong aggressiveness especially if they got into that position via their contacts/family/inheritance.
 
No point in leaving your basement as a manlet, tbh
 
All the manlets are too busy rotting alone in there room
 
I wonder if this would apply to major business between 1800-1900. I have a feeling it wouldn't. Also the average IQ of many CEOs while being slightly above average, tends to not be anything special. I'd really be questioning why there aren't many people with 130-160IQs in major positions of powers. It's all about status, looks, and connections. Not merit.

Lol maybe the statistics in the 1800-1900s were probably already more than half percentage above average height

It's only going to get beyond hardER and ovER for manlets, in the future CEO height statistics would be 99.999999999999999% above average height
 
water is wet. this is textbook heightism
 
It's just their personalities and IQs bro
 
I wonder if this would apply to major business between 1800-1900. I have a feeling it wouldn't. Also the average IQ of many CEOs while being slightly above average, tends to not be anything special. I'd really be questioning why there aren't many people with 130-160IQs in major positions of powers. It's all about status, looks, and connections. Not merit.
High IQ post
 
I wonder if this would apply to major business between 1800-1900. I have a feeling it wouldn't. Also the average IQ of many CEOs while being slightly above average, tends to not be anything special. I'd really be questioning why there aren't many people with 130-160IQs in major positions of powers. It's all about status, looks, and connections. Not merit.
Most CEOs are less than 130 IQ you mean?
 
For life height > face
For dating, face barely beats height, but if I had a chance, tall ugly > good looking manlet

This. I’ve seen tall ugly guys do alright, but I have never, ever, ever seen a manlet have success with foids.
 
Most CEOs are less than 130 IQ you mean?
Yes, according to some fringe data at most they're around 120+, but there's far more 130, extremely high IQ individuals who are not in these positions of power. I know IQ isn't everything but in a proper merit based system that worked against monopolies and corruption I gurantee this wouldn't be happening. I brought up 1800-1900 aswell because I gurantee there wasn't this disproportionate height difference back then aswell as you see today with the focus dividing men and women, partly because of extreme standards put on men as hypergamy intensifies.
 
Wikipedia also says the holocaust happened, so it's not really that good of a source.
 
Yes, according to some fringe data at most they're around 120+, but there's far more 130, extremely high IQ individuals who are not in these positions of power. I know IQ isn't everything but in a proper merit based system that worked against monopolies and corruption I gurantee this wouldn't be happening. I brought up 1800-1900 aswell because I gurantee there wasn't this disproportionate height difference back then aswell as you see today with the focus dividing men and women, partly because of extreme standards put on men as hypergamy intensifies.
That’s interesting. I wonder if that’s because past 130 social skills often take a dip. Apparently IQ in the 120s is the most socially successful range of men because once you get into the 130s it becomes harder to establish rapport with people who are average. I can see why being a good social communicator would be equally important to being smart when trying to rise up a corporate hierarchy. Billionaires that have super high IQs, above 130 tend to be involved in tech and be socially awkward (I.e. Cuckerberg.)
 
That’s interesting. I wonder if that’s because past 130 social skills often take a dip. Apparently IQ in the 120s is the most socially successful range of men because once you get into the 130s it becomes harder to establish rapport with people who are average. I can see why being a good social communicator would be equally important to being smart when trying to rise up a corporate hierarchy. Billionaires that have super high IQs, above 130 tend to be involved in tech and be socially awkward (I.e. Cuckerberg.)
I wouldn't give the 120 thing the biggest merit in the world, that's just the most extreme datapoint I could find in their favor, i'd wager on average CEO's IQs are between 105-115 which while being slightly above average shouldn't be the biggest factor in the world compared to the millions of people with IQ's and genetic compatibility that could be much more well purposed to be in the positions they are in. People rise up in power because of connections, low agreeableness, looks, etc, but even if you have low agreeableness, great communication skills, but you're some 5'3 manlet with an IQ of 150 hypothetically, even if you have a decent face, you statistically will not even come close to the chances these guys have.

The system is corrupt in my view.
 
I wouldn't give the 120 thing the biggest merit in the world, that's just the most extreme datapoint I could find in their favor, i'd wager on average CEO's IQs are between 105-115 which while being slightly above average shouldn't be the biggest factor in the world compared to the millions of people with IQ's and genetic compatibility that could be much more well purposed to be in the positions they are in. People rise up in power because of connections, low agreeableness, looks, etc, but even if you have low agreeableness, great communication skills, but you're some 5'3 manlet with an IQ of 150 hypothetically, even if you have a decent face, you statistically will not even come close to the chances these guys have.

The system is corrupt in my view.
Yeah, I agree. Though the strangest exception to that rule I’ve ever seen is Bernie Ecclestone, rising from nothing to become a multi billionaire at the height of 5’. Search up a pic of him standing next to his daughters.
 

Similar threads

can't cope no more
Replies
9
Views
255
JustanotherKanga
J
Racial-Identitarian
Replies
15
Views
330
Qizarate
Qizarate
lowz1r
Replies
13
Views
337
Balding Subhuman
Balding Subhuman
Stupid Clown
Replies
16
Views
660
VideoGameCoper
VideoGameCoper

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top