SeetheBot9000
Veteran
★★★★
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2023
- Posts
- 1,262
https://psmag.com/environment/17-to-1-reproductive-success
Once upon a time, 4,000 to 8,000 years after humanity invented agriculture, something very strange happened to human reproduction. Across the globe, for every 17 women who were reproducing, passing on genes that are still around today—only one man did the same.
"It wasn't like there was a mass death of males. They were there, so what were they doing?" asks Melissa Wilson Sayres, a computational biologist at Arizona State University, and a member of a group of scientists who uncovered this moment in prehistory by analyzing modern genes.
Another member of the research team, a biological anthropologist, hypothesizes that somehow, only a few men accumulated lots of wealth and power, leaving nothing for others. These men could then pass their wealth on to their sons, perpetuating this pattern of elitist reproductive success. Then, as more thousands of years passed, the numbers of men reproducing, compared to women, rose again. "Maybe more and more people started being successful," Wilson Sayres says. In more recent history, as a global average, about four or five women reproduced for every one man.
So basically, inceldom is eternal, lads, and there is no hope OTHER than the institutions of marriage created by religion, probably for the sole purpose of keeping society functioning. Now society is crumbling and we are going back to how it was thousands of years ago, before pussy was distributed more evenly by our leaders and priests. Only the kings of the jungle with either looks/height/big dicks or wealth will be reproducing now. The sexual revolution has single-handedly erased 8000 years of societal progress. Thanks for that, foids
Once upon a time, 4,000 to 8,000 years after humanity invented agriculture, something very strange happened to human reproduction. Across the globe, for every 17 women who were reproducing, passing on genes that are still around today—only one man did the same.
"It wasn't like there was a mass death of males. They were there, so what were they doing?" asks Melissa Wilson Sayres, a computational biologist at Arizona State University, and a member of a group of scientists who uncovered this moment in prehistory by analyzing modern genes.
Another member of the research team, a biological anthropologist, hypothesizes that somehow, only a few men accumulated lots of wealth and power, leaving nothing for others. These men could then pass their wealth on to their sons, perpetuating this pattern of elitist reproductive success. Then, as more thousands of years passed, the numbers of men reproducing, compared to women, rose again. "Maybe more and more people started being successful," Wilson Sayres says. In more recent history, as a global average, about four or five women reproduced for every one man.
So basically, inceldom is eternal, lads, and there is no hope OTHER than the institutions of marriage created by religion, probably for the sole purpose of keeping society functioning. Now society is crumbling and we are going back to how it was thousands of years ago, before pussy was distributed more evenly by our leaders and priests. Only the kings of the jungle with either looks/height/big dicks or wealth will be reproducing now. The sexual revolution has single-handedly erased 8000 years of societal progress. Thanks for that, foids