Deleted member 1780
FBIcel
-
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2017
- Posts
- 3,111
Let's see who is low IQ here
Multiplied by 2
And then?Wrong.
And then?
guess I'm low iq, overConsider the polynomial
It can be factored as follows (with the roots in ascending order):
The answer is the final root of this polynomial.
guess I'm low iq, over
It's not really wrong if you only present us this single sequence of numbers.Wrong.
It's not really wrong if you only present us this single sequence of numbers.
Mutliplied by 2 is a valid answer.
highest of the iq17 comes after 16 obv
you never showed us the sum niggaConsider the polynomial
It can be factored as follows (with the roots in ascending order):
The answer is the final root of this polynomial.
No sane person would ever think of that without additional informationConsider the polynomial
It can be factored as follows (with the roots in ascending order):
The answer is the final root of this polynomial.
Multiplied by 2
Too bad you can't prove I voted 32Nope. I, as the administer of this IQ test, had an idea of what I thought is the correct answer on the test. You all failed my test, and will be labeled low IQ now.
17 comes after 16 obv
No sane person would ever think of that without aditional information
Literally the only pattern that can be seen in just "2,4,8,16" is
Yeah, Occam's Razor would lead even the smartest people to believe it's just x2, but any fart-sniffing test administrator can bury Occam's Razor under convoluted intellectual clutter when the question is purely theoretical or hypothetical.The point is that you could construct any valid sequence from 2,4,8,16 ...
So why would one lose 'IQ Points' because they didn't see what the author of the IQ test expected? It is complete nonsense, and has nothing to do with intelligence. Is this a test for who can produce the most expected answers?
tbh op watched too many moviesNo sane person would ever think of that without additional information
Literally the only pattern that can be seen in just "2,4,8,16" is
I really doubt that IQ tests are constructed like that tbh.The point is that you could construct any valid sequence from 2,4,8,16 ...
So why would one lose 'IQ Points' because they didn't see what the author of the IQ test expected? It is complete nonsense, and has nothing to do with intelligence. Is this a test for who can produce the most expected answers? Then you are merely a dog doing tricks.
I see what you did hereNope. I, as the administer of this IQ test, had an idea of what I thought is the correct answer on the test. You all failed my test, and will be labeled low IQ now.
And how am I supposed to know that was behind the sequence and not the much more intuitive x2 progression?Consider the polynomial
It can be factored as follows (with the roots in ascending order):
The answer is the final root of this polynomial.
And how am I supposed to know that was behind the sequence and not the much more intuitive x2 progression?
Keep in mind I suck at math.
Nope. I, as the administer of this IQ test, had an idea of what I thought is the correct answer on the test. You all failed my test, and will be labeled low IQ now.
Lmao sounds like the teachers at school who have equally vague questionsNope. I, as the administer of this IQ test, had an idea of what I thought is the correct answer on the test. You all failed my test, and will be labeled low IQ now.
WAS I RIGHTDude you literally gave the answer. It's ?.
///
Wrong answer motherfucker
Guess thats right in ur toungeTugudu
///